It will have an identifiable primary source base and will be assessed in terms of research, argument, contextualisation and presentation.
For Doctoral candidates, this evaluation determines whether or not the candidate is ready to proceed to the oral defence. Passed If the thesis meets the general criteria for the degree sought, as well as those listed on the examiner's report form see: Master's Examiner report form ; Doctoral Examiner report formit should be evaluated as 'Passed', even if some changes are recommended.
For doctoral theses, External Examiners who will not be at the oral defence must also provide a list of questions to be asked of the candidate at the oral defence. An evaluation of 'Not Passed' should be given if: Major revisions are needed, such as: Stylistic or editorial changes are not normally considered to be major revisions, but if the quality of the presentation is so poor that extensive rewriting is required, the thesis should not be passed.
Examiners are asked to identify required changes clearly in their reports. The supervisor or another designated person will ensure that the student corrects the thesis and that it appropriately reflects the examiners' suggestions for revisions prior to re-submission of the thesis.
The candidate will normally revise and re-submit the thesis for re-assessment, usually by the same examiner. In rare cases, a revised thesis may be sent to a new examiner if the first examiner is not available to re-examine the thesis.Evaluation Criteria for Master's Theses a thesis must meet the criteria for a good thesis.
To receive a pass grade, the thesis must meet all the criteria for a sufficient thesis. The overall grade is the average value of the component grades.
The Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue. Guidelines for Education and Training in Industrial-Organizational Psychology. A PDF version of this document is available here.
The SIOP Curriculum Matrix Template is available here.
Assessment Criteria Level of Student Performance 3 2 1 Superior Satisfactory Unacceptable Meets the standard; A or B level work Falls short of the standard/ needs improvement, but student is developing towards proficiency; rough equivalent, C level work Does not meet the standard, work is roughly equivalent to a D/F level Thesis, argument, and.
Les langues sont un facteur fondamental dans la vie des citoyens et le fonctionnement démocratique des sociétés. À l’écoute des besoins identifiés dans ou par ses États membres, le Conseil de l’Europe a œuvré, tout au long des dernières décennies, à la constitution d’un ensemble de.
Assessment Scale: The table below is not an grading matrix, but contains criteria that have to help the assessors situate the master’s thesis within the different aspects. The final obtained mark is a weighted average of these different aspects.